Obviously, this is not always true, but it seems plausible. Second, people with little experience might need more personal support and motivation than people who already have a lot of experience. I personally have managed to solve dozens of tricky personal & professional problems with the help of Masterminds groups - problems which I was not able to solve on my own.
It is surely not true for any imaginable group, but I would guess it is true in the case of intellectually humble and reasonably smart people with similar values, who come together explicitely to support each other. This is true even if none of my peers have any experience that I don't have. If your claim is that Masterminds are only worthwhile for experienced people, then I disagree for two reasons:įirst, the way I see Masterminds, one core aspect is that a group of peers can be much more effective in thinking through problems than a single individual. Would you say that inexperienced people benefit less from a Mastermind than experienced people? Or would you say that they benefit so little that a Mastermind is not worth for them?
0 kommentar(er)
